Please note: This is an extract from Hansard only. Hansard extracts are reproduced with permission from the Parliament of Tasmania.
SECOND READING SPEECH
PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITIES (NATIONAL
UNIFORM LEGISLATION) IMPLEMENTATION BILL 2010
Mister Speaker, I move that the Bill be now read a second time.
Earlier this year Parliament passed the
Personal PropertySecurities (Commonwealth Powers) Bill 2010
, which referredcertain powers and responsibilities in relation to personal
property securities to the Commonwealth Government.
The
Personal Property Securities (National Uniform Legislation)Implementation Bill 2011
provides practical mechanismsnecessary to facilitate the transfer of responsibility for personal
property securities to the Commonwealth and to deal with the
exclusion of certain property that could be used as collateral
for a security from coverage by the Commonwealth Act.
The Bill allows for the transfer of information held on four
Tasmanian securities registers to the new Commonwealth
Personal Property Securities Register.
The Bill will repeal the
Bills of Sale Act 1900, the Stock, Wool andCrop Mortgages Act 1930
and the Motor Vehicles Securities Act1984
as the registers established and maintained by thesepieces of legislation will be subsumed into the Commonwealth
Personal Property Securities Register. The Bill will also repeal
those parts of the
Cooperatives Act 1999 which deal with theregister of cooperative charges as the securities that would be
registered there will now be registered on the Commonwealth
Personal Property Securities Register.
As noted in the debate on the referral legislation there was to
be ongoing discussion as to what licences issued by Tasmanian
authorities should be excluded from the ambit of the
Commonwealth legislation. After extensive consultation with
Tasmanian Government Departments, it has been determined
that only a small number of licences and leases are to be
excluded from the operation of the Commonwealth
PersonalProperty Securities Act
because either they are unsuitable for useas a security or are subject to an existing registration scheme
which achieves a similar purpose to the registration of
securities in the PPS Register.
Consistent with a decision made at national level, all licences
and leases issued under the
Mineral Resources Development Act1995
are, like water licences, being excluded from theoperation of the Commonwealth Act. I am advised that there
is already a comprehensive, industry specific regime in place
dealing with the recording of interests of third parties in
licences which is nationally consistent. Therefore, the industry
does not consider that there is a need to also register interests
on the Personal Property Securities Register.
Licences under the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 will
also be excluded from the operation of PPS legislation.
Currently there is one pipeline licence issued under this Act. It
is a pipeline from Victoria to Tasmania and the Tasmanian end
continues on from licences in Commonwealth and Victorian
waters. The Commonwealth are exempting all titles under
their offshore petroleum legislation so it would make no sense
for the Tasmanian part of the pipeline to be captured by the
PPS legislation. As the pipelines themselves run across the
waters of different jurisdictions, the licences issued to allow
them are not suitable for use as a personal property security.
The States and Territories that have legislated so far have
excluded a significant number of licences and leases from the
operation of the Commonwealth’s
Personal Property SecuritiesAct
. However it is considered that there is no sound publicpolicy justification for this move. The Personal Property
Securities Register provides a safe and easy method for
registering and dealing with securities over personal property.
Excluding licences and leases from the operation of PPS,
particularly in the absence of an alternate method of registering
the security, could be to the detriment of business people
trying to secure finance to support their business ventures.
Further the range of conditions over the transfer of licences to
be found in the various Acts will continue to apply to the
licences and their transfer to a third party even if the security is
registered on the PPS Register and has to be enforced by the
financier. The State’s requirements will not be affected and the
various licence authorities will still exercise their powers and
discretions in relation to transfers.
The Bill also makes a number of technical amendments to
Tasmanian legislation so that terminology used in the Acts is
consistent with the terminology used in relation to the new
Personal Property Securities system.
I commend the Bill to the House.